I am finding that blogging can be both good and bad. For one it is a way to speak out as a citizen of this country against the corruption that truly does exist, but is not reported on because it would ruin the pillaging that government officials, attorneys, and highly paid officers of big wall street companies. I take pride in the information I put on my blogs and I would not want information that I did not believe to be true to be on these blogs. There is a big disagreement between myself and investigative blogger, Crystal L. Cox on this topic.
Crystal has written that my dad, Mark Neuman is evil. He is not Crystal has written that I have a $100 Million dollar secret. I do not. Crystal has written that my hospitalization was my husbands fault or my families fault. It was not.
I do believe that Brian and Sharon Stevens have things they are hiding and wanted to shut me up. Sharon was threatening my loved ones to call the police after I told her I was making a documentry on this topic. I think she thought I knew their secrets. She has never shown any interest in me prior to this incident.
In all of the newspaper articles and in the trustee’s report Brian Stevens’ name is barely mentioned. This seems very odd since he was there since the beginning just like Mark Neuman who has been mention many times in the papers and especially in the trustee’s report.
If you have any questions on what is fact and what is fishing, please feel free to email me at looktoyourheart@gmail.com
NOW REMEMBER – Kevin Padrick was supposed to be working for Summit 1031 at this point as an advisor to them on assisting THEM with their Chapter 11 Bankruptcy – Debtor in Possession – As advised by their Attorney’s Sussman Shank.
Brian Stevens: From our very minimal discussions with Sussman, Sussman said there wasn’t much communication from Obsidian. After you gave your presentation to the creditors’ committee, someone sent us a power point. And that was kind of an overall….I was still on the….. It’s like, gosh, what’s being done other than than selling this thing to the creditors? I think that’s what our mistrust was…. It felt like, you know, you guys were hired…. We had a little bit of relationship established and then it disappeared. It felt like everything was towards the creditors. We felt we had a…. really our motivation is the same as yours which is to get money to the creditors. Why aren’t we being used in any way while like, hey, we’re looking,at this property. We offered up our assistance. I totally realize the creditors don’t trust us, but it seems like you guys could have used us in some way throughout this. That was, I guess, the frustrating thing so that the farther this went along the more I felt that there was almost like a plot. Like there was a plot all along to… okay, we’ve got the money from them these guys, and here’s our plot. And then, and not working out a solution with lots of players involved.
This was the Bend Bulletin’s Response to Mark Neuman’s Letter to the Editor. Our Community Newspaper can put out 5 Front Page Articles with ONLY ONE side of the story, but IGNORE communication from their community to HEAR the other Side. Sorry, but I think the Newspaper Reporting will be going out of business as the INTERNET TAKES OVER and Truth tellers are allowed to speak. I think I spotted Andrew Moore checking this site out on my stats. He should do a FRONT PAGE article on the other side, but that is not the NEWSPAPER’s way of doing things, is it?
Poor Andrew can’t be all to blame – after all he said it himself “This is obviously a very complex matter and I’m like a caveman at a physics convention”
THE OREGONIAN…has IGNORED THE INFORMATION on this SITE as well. They spent a GOOD 13 SECONDS here. I AM GLAD our NEWS REPORTERS are WORKING HARD to get you the INFORMATION YOU NEED TO MAKE GOOD DECISIONS.
I told my dad to post this letter on my website/blog where the TRUTH can be TOLD. If you want the whole story in the Bend Bulletin – Contact Andrew Moore at 541-617-7820 or at amoore@bendbulletin.com to see IF YOUR VOICE can be heard.
To the Editor -
The failure late last year of Summit Accommodators, Inc., of which I was a principal, has been a humbling experience for me. Never could I have dreamed that circumstances could intersect in such a way that would cause the organization to crumble overnight. I’m truly sorry for the pain it has caused all of the exchangers. I can only sincerely hope and pray that the assets we provided and any other monies available will result in the exchangers being made whole.
But this letter isn’t about me. I’d like to write out about my former partners at Summit, Tim Larkin and Lane Lyons.
The bankruptcy trustee and the media have thrown these two men into the Summit fire on equal basis with me. It is in the best interest of the trustee, Kevin Padrick, to have as many “bad” guys as possible. Don’t confuse “trustee” with the word “trust”.He is a hired gun brought in by the creditors’ committee and is paying himself large “commissions”. So far he gets an A+++ for making the situation seem the worst possible. The more criminal he can make it sound, the more chance he has at getting settlements from banks, bonding companies, etc. The more successful he is, the more he fills his pockets with those “commissions”.
The trustee’s insistence on throwing Larkin and Lyons under the Summit bus is just plain unfair.Both of these men came to work long after the business practice of making business loans with a portion of Summit’s exchange money was part of the business.
Tim Larkin came earlier in that timeline. He inherited a business plan which included the business loan strategy. He was a strong manager and leader.He helped keep the company focused and made major contributions to streamlining operations along with much higher accountability. He came to work every day and operated with a high sense of integrity. I can’t imagine a business team not wanting Tim Larkin on the team.
Lane Lyonscamemuch later in the game. As an attorney he was invaluable in shoring up legal agreements for Summit. He brought a much higher level of legal regimen for the organization. He always operated with the best of intentions. He doesn’t have a criminal bone in his body. Once again, Lane’s sense of integrity is among the highest.
Neither of these men benefitted personally from company loans in a significant way. In fact, Lyons owes the company a very small undeterminable amount. Tim Larkin owes the company virtually nothing as he is on the hook for a $917,000 personal loan, money which was deposited into one of the entities that has been turned over to the bankruptcy estate. That amount far exceeds any loans he made. That property is in foreclosure now and Larkin will take the full credit hit.
These men are not responsible for the Summit debacle. The impact of their hard work and foresight contributed to a huge reduction in outstanding loans over the last two years of Summit’s operations. Two years before the bankruptcy, they both insisted on a moratorium of all loan activity. They insisted on a new business plan which included an end to the practice of loaning a portion of the exchange funds. That became the policy. Tim Larkin heartily pursued liquidation of real estate, the majority of which was not his, for the total pay down of all amounts owed.
After bankruptcy was declared, no one worked harder than Larkin and Lyons in doing everything in their power to provide all required information.Larkin’s very detailed spreadsheet of all related real estate was provided directly to Kevin Padrick so Obsidian Finance had little work to do. Lyons spent countless hours working with exchangers to help finish their exchanges despite all the hurdles that the bankruptcy attorneys threw at him. They both did everything and anything they could possibly do to help benefit the creditors. They did this despite their roles being unfairly characterized by the trustee and the media. That’s the kind of men they are. That’s the kind of men they always will be, no matter what the trustee says, no matter what the paper says, no matter what people who like to gossip say.